90a

10 am sharp, a silent hall, the DPRK delegation of Representative and the “United Nations forces” delegation chief from the south gate of the hall into the hall, were seated at the signing table. The two chief parties to help sign people in this assistance, the parties have been prepared 9 Armistice Agreement was signed, and then signed by the person at the same time help the exchange of text, and then cross to the other side of 9 to sign the Armistice Agreement. Signed by the staff provided help after the 9 Armistice Agreement as soon as possible take home pay has been the commander of the signing parties. The two chief within 10 minutes, 18 text signed. Have agreed to advance, both as a chief sign of the time that the time of signing the Armistice Agreement. Signing ceremony at the end of 10:10.

10 o’clock that night, the supreme commander of the Korean People’s Army, Marshal Kim Il Sung in Pyongyang, the prime minister, in the Armistice Agreement signed. At eight o’clock on the July 2nd 9:30, commander of the Chinese People’s Volunteers, General Peng Kaesong in the DPRK delegation of the conference room Laifeng village volunteers, the Armistice Agreement signed.
July 27, “United Nations forces,” Commander in Chief, U.S. Army General Mark Clark in the tent in Munsan signed the Armistice Agreement. Clark later recalled the situation of the Korean War, said: “May 1952, I ordered the ‘UN forces’ commander in chief, on behalf of 17 countries to resist communist aggression in Korea. 15 months later, I signed a ceasefire agreement … … that unfortunate war in the peninsula, for me it also said that my 40year military career ended. It is my experience one of the highest military post, but it does not honor. in the implementation of my Government’s instructions, I get a Item unenviable honor that I became the history of the armistice treaty signed there is no victory in the first U.S. Army commander. I am a disappointment and pain. I think my two predecessors, General MacArthur and Ridgway, with its share . “

picture is horrible, burnt by the British consumer drug sofa thigh as he got a serious skin disease. It is said the British market by the DMF treatment on sale leather sofa made in China about 10 million. In addition to this already completed more than 1,600 consumer complaints, in addition to 3,000 cases in progress. This closed more than 1,600, per person available from 1175 to 9000 pounds in compensation. Compensation for the goods by the retailers involved in insurance company payments. So far, Britain has not recall such a sofa. Dimethyl fumarate gave rise to the source of the disaster two years ago, at least pushed. In 2009, the EU issued a ban against dimethyl fumarate, recently announced the ban was extended to March 15, 2011, China Import and Export Inspection and Quarantine

British businessmen, “China toxic sofa” claim 20 million April 26, the United Kingdom Supreme Court “made in China toxic sofa” class action case hearing. The plaintiff and the defendant agreed to sell toxic sofa retailers, over 1,600 British consumers will compensate the huge sum of money totaling 20 million pounds. Amount paid by insurance companies. Is said to be the largest in British history in a class action. Toxic sofa leather sofa incident because the treatment of dimethyl fumarate (DMF). DMF has a strong bactericidal effect, can inhibit more than 30 kinds of common bacteria, yeasts and molds, are widely used in leather, footwear, textiles, wood products such as bacteria and fungus treatment, but if excessive use of rich Dimethyl Ma, may cause consumers allergic reactions, pain, rash or burns. BBC posted the relevant